Canada's aggressive new Anti-Spam legislation came into effect on July 1, 2014. A key component of the legislation is that the sender must receive consent (approval) in order to send someone a "Commercial Electronic Message." A CEM is defined as "any electronic message that encourages participation in a commercial activity, regardless of whether there is an expectation for profit."
This blog is not a comprehensive review of the legislation or a list of everything your organization needs to do to comply. Instead, we will focus on the "people" aspects that impact HR professionals and business managers.
Build awareness among your team members:
Some of the exceptions to the need for explicit consent:
Real world example:
What about Social Media posts?
What about recruiting new employees?
Want to learn more about establishing employee policies and procedures?
You should attend Clear Path's upcoming "Setting the Rules of the Game: Creating an Effective Employee Policy Book" session. It is being held on November 6th and will cover a wide variety of topics, including CASL Compliance policies. Click here to learn more or to register.
We'd love to connect with you!
Yet another social media “oops” has surfaced in the news – and this time, it happened in Canada. This past Monday, three Toronto firefighters were terminated based on comments they made on social media. This recent decision was met with heavy criticism and sparked anger from their union, which insists that the firings do nothing to promote a culture of respect in the city’s fire hall (Source: City News).
What makes this case a little different from some of the other “social media blunders” we’ve seen in the past, is that their terminations resulted from a month-long investigation into the firefighter’s tweets and other social media posts. Toronto Fire Chief Jim Sales said that the investigation was launched after a media report in August said two firefighters had posted several posts on Twitter that were seen as degrading to women (Source: City News). Many of the posts in question were direct quotes from television shows like The Office and South Park.
Here are some of the tweets under fire from firefighter Matt Bowman (@Hero_Matt):
A few months later, firefighter Lawaun Edwards posted the following response to a friend’s tweet:
Upon learning of these tweets last month, Bowman and Edwards were both suspended with pay (Source: The Star). However, Sales has said that they have now been let go along with a third firefighter who has not yet been identified. The investigation discovered a “pattern” of inappropriate social media use and public comments that were in violation of the city policies (Source: City News).
As employees of the City of Toronto, firefighters are required to follow the city’s social media guidelines. These guidelines state that:
"Employees should not engage in harassment, personal attacks, or abuse toward individuals or organizations,” and “not use language that is discriminatory, hateful, or violent towards identifiable groups or that incites others to discriminate, practice hate or violence.”
It remains to be seen if these tweets were posted while on the job or during personal time. This is a question that has also surfaced in many other cases surrounding employee terminations due to inappropriate or discriminatory social media posts or actions (see Big Brother Blog and NFL Blog): Does behaviour displayed outside of the workplace hold the same weight as behaviour displayed within the workplace when it comes to terminations?
In a statement to the press, Jim Sales (on behalf of Toronto Fire Services) went on to say that:
“The Toronto public service fosters a corporate culture that sets the highest standard of integrity, professionalism, and ethical behaviour. It is our expectation all employees demonstrate and uphold these core values... Members of the Toronto Fire Service are in positions of public trust. This trust is paramount to the division’s ability to carry out its work and deliver critical services to all Toronto residents”.
In response to these terminations, the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association (Union) issued a public statement reading:
“The association is outraged by these terminations and will make every effort to have these members reinstated. These terminations neither address the specific issues that have been raised nor do they promote the alleged objectives of the fire service.”
So what do you think about these recent terminations? Are you siding with Toronto Fire Services on this one or the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association? Leave your comments below.
We'd love to connect with you!
Let’s think back to 8 years ago, where Facebook was not yet a household name, Twitter was non-existent, and LinkedIn was only just starting to become established. It’s amazing how much can change in less than a decade. Since then, the use of social media has exploded. Facebook now has over 1 billion monthly active users, Twitter has an average of 58 million tweets a day, and LinkedIn has become a central networking tool for over 200 million professionals worldwide. Because of this, social media has also successfully weaved itself into the workplace.
From employees posting negative things about their employers on Facebook and Twitter, to a discussion about the ownership of your social media connections, the news has been flooded with countless stories about social media and its impact in the workplace.
"FIRE ME...Make my day"
In a recent case, a woman was involved in a group discussion with some of her fellow co-workers on Facebook where she ranted about her employers and pleaded to be fired. Well, let's just say she got her wish. One of her colleagues took a print-out of the rant to her managers and she was promptly fired.
The employee then sought the help of the National Labour Relations Board claiming that she had been fired in retaliation for protected concerted activity. It was decided that she was not entitled to proceed with the case. (Source)
Situations like this have been plastered all over the news in recent years. From elementary school teachers posting inappropriate photos of themselves on Facebook, to frustrated employees ranting about work in their status updates, some people have little to no discretion when it comes to what's posted on social media. This case just goes to show you some of the consequences that can come from that and the importance, as employers, of having a social media policy in place. Check out one of our past blogs on the topic.
Social media for recruitment and selection
The relationship between the workplace and social media is not always a negative one however. More and more, employers are using social media to their advantage - not just as a means to connect with their client and prospect base, but as a means to bring top talent into the workplace.
Social networking sites expand the once limited options for recruitment and selection. Many employers use these sites as tools to recruit candidates who might not normally apply.
In a recent survey done by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), a number of interesting statistics surfaced around the relationship between social networking websites and the recruitment and selection process. Here is some of the data that was pulled:
Owning social media content
"Who owns the social media content created and maintained in the course of employment? Work product is traditionally the proprietary interest of the employer. But there’s something different about social media content." Source
When it comes to the connections you make on LinkedIn, the relationships you form with potential clients, and the networks you form while in an occupation - who exactly owns those contacts? Do they belong to the employee on the LinkedIn account or to the employer? That's the debate.
Most would agree that the key purpose of LinkedIn is to either generate business in your current occupation (increase your employers client base) or to generate business and connections for the next position (networking). Yes, it is true that the network developed an nurtured by an employee on a LinkedIn account is a crucial tool for them to have in their career, but it is also true that employers have a good reason to assert a proprietary interest over its customer list. So which is it?
The LinkedIn User Agreement is between the individual and LinkedIn. This means that, despite the "proprietary interest" argument on behalf of the employer, all connections made ultimately belong to the employee. Traditional standards have been shaken up by this rise in social media - something that testifies to the importance of being up-to-date with all the changes.
One thing has been reaffirmed after all these cases and debates surrounding social media - the importance of implementing social media policy in your workplace.
This hot topic is one we will cover in our Employee Policy Manual learning session held in September 2013. Visit our website for more information.
We'd love to connect with you!
The story about the Ontario man fired from a retail store due to insensitive online posts about the death of Amanda Todd, is not the first time we've seen a story like this.
More and more we are seeing companies run into trouble when it comes to their employees using social media. Now, more than ever, companies need to be including a social media policy in their employee manual. With the future of employees being a generation that grew up online, specific rules and guidelines must be set out so companies can avoid stories like the one above.
Where do I begin?
Social Media Today posted a list of 100 companies and their social media policies that they have implemented. This is a place to start and get ideas on what needs to go into your policy.
Something to think about
"A big issue is the tradeoff that employers expect employees to make. If they want their employees to be available 24/7 and are giving them BlackBerry's and PC's to contact them outside of business hours, it is inevitable that people are going to use those devices on their personal time as well as business time. That's an inevitable consequence of asking people to be on call beyond eight hours a day" -Frank Addairo, Mitchell LLP
What should employers do?
Basic rule of thumb:
An employer has no authority over what employees do once they're off the clock unless the employer can show its legitimate business interests are affected.
We'd love to connect with you!
Social media has taken the world by storm and developed into an unbelievable method of communication. Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Instagram etc. have expanded our approach to sharing thoughts, ideas, opinions, blogs, videos, and photos. These resources allow us to stay updated through a push of a button and get connected with one another in new ways. Businesses are starting to take advantage of these platforms to connect with customers and get real-time thoughts and opinions about their company and their employees. As Social Media redefines the future of business, savvy employers are staying ahead of the game by adding the specifics about Social Media use to job positions and procedure manuals.
Younger workers are most likely going to have their own Social Media accounts that allow them to connect with their own friends and family and they will be very comfortable translating this over to their work life. Developing your expectations regarding when and how Social Media can be used in the workplace is a must. Unmonitored Social Media use can result in an unfocused workplace and declining productivity. The language of Social Media is also very different and should be considered. Should the use of jargon which is becoming more and more embedded in today's social culture, phrases like "omg" (Oh My Gosh), "lol" (Laugh Out Loud), "nbd" (No Big Deal) be used in the workplace? Some may argue it is appropriate to be current and fully connected, others may argue it is unprofessional. How about sharing photos with peers and customers? What about the type of content your employees may be posting for example to company Facebook pages? Should Social Media usage be tracked? Have you updated your employee policy manuals with respect to Social Media recently? With your employees connecting with potential customers or each other on these various platforms, it's critical to establish your expectations along with procedures surrounding appropriate use.
As Social Media continues to change the way we communicate, remember to customize your policies to fit with your company's potentially changing goals and objectives. Staying on top of your employee policies and update your books may be a daunting task. Need assistance with revising an existing or developing an employee policy manual? Clear Path can help! Check out our workshops for more details or give us a call to discuss your specific questions.
We'd love to connect with you!
Many employers are still feeling bewildered about how far they can go in monitoring employee use of social media inside and outside the workplace. Liabilities such as a damaged company reputation and workplace conflict are serious concerns for employers.
Recent judicial decisions are showing us that information shared on social media, blogging and internet communication forums via sites like Facebook or Twitter are not private, and are published with the knowledge that it could be viewed by members of the public. Melanie Reist; a civil litigation lawyer and partner of Kitchener firm Morrison Reist, recently highlighted some landmark decisions from arbitrators, tribunal members and courts in the March/April 2012 issue of Exchange Magazine.
These cases help show that employers do not have to feel like they are fighting a losing battle against "the social media monster" if they have a clear written policy in place. The digital media age is changing constantly and it's important for employers to recognize that a consistent policy is an essential tool if you are in a situation where you need to dismiss an employee for a social media/internet related misconduct. (Read Melanie Reist's recommendations for a social media policy on Page 44 of Exchange Magazine).
Your policy and how it will be enforced should be clearly communicated to all employees. You can ensure that consequences for breaching the policy are clearly understood through the use of real world examples. In our previous blog, "You Cannot Control the Use of Social Media, but You Can Manage it Effectively" (visit social media blog section) we outline what constitutes non-permissible behaviour" and some free tools at your disposal to monitor internet communications.
If you would like to discuss creating how to implement an acceptable Internet Use and Social Media policy, please contact Anna Aceto-Guerin directly at (519) 624-0800 or via email at email@example.com
We'd love to connect with you!
Clear Path Employer Services
295 Thompson Drive, Unit 2
Cambridge, Ontario N1T 2B9
T: (519) 624-0800
T: (888) 336-0950
F: (519) 624-0860
Website created by:
Hear More About Us:
Spread the Word: